view tests/mini/naked_asm5.d @ 1499:df11cdec45a2

Another shot at fixing the issues with (constant) struct literals and their addresses. See DMD2682, #218, #324. The idea is to separate the notion of const from 'this variable can always be replaced with its initializer' in the frontend. To do that, I introduced Declaration::isSameAsInitializer, which is overridden in VarDeclaration to return false for constants that have a struct literal initializer. So {{{ const S s = S(5); void foo() { auto ps = &s; } // is no longer replaced by void foo() { auto ps = &(S(5)); } }}} To make taking the address of a struct constant with a struct-initializer outside of function scope possible, I made sure that AddrExp::optimize doesn't try to run the argument's optimization with WANTinterpret - that'd again replace the constant with a struct literal temporary.
author Christian Kamm <kamm incasoftware de>
date Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:49:58 +0200
parents e92e14690a4f
children
line wrap: on
line source

int foo(int op)(int a, int b)
{
    version(X86)
    {
    const OP = (op == '+') ? "add" : "sub";
    version (Windows)
    {
    	asm { naked; }
    	mixin("asm{push EBP;mov EBP,ESP;sub ESP,8;mov ECX,[EBP+8];"~OP~" EAX, ECX;add ESP,8;pop EBP;}");
    	asm { ret; }
	} else
	{
    	asm { naked; }
    	mixin("asm{"~OP~" EAX, [ESP+4];}");
    	asm { ret 4; }
	}
    }
    else version(X86_64)
    {
    const OP = (op == '+') ? "add" : "sub";
    asm { naked; }
    mixin("asm{"~OP~" ESI,EDI; mov EAX, ESI;}");
    asm { ret; }
    }
    else static assert(0, "todo");
}

void main()
{
        int i = foo!('+')(2, 4);
        assert(i == 6);
        i = foo!('-')(2, 4);
        assert(i == 2);
}