view tests/mini/asm7.d @ 1351:8d501abecd24

Initial (but disabled) fix for ticket #294 , the actual part that fixes the bug is in a #if 0 block as I'm afraid it will cause regressions. I'm most likely not going to be around tonight, and maybe not tomorrow as well, so I'm pushing it in case someone wants to run some serious testing/investigate the problem noted in llvmhelpers.cpp : realignOffset .
author Tomas Lindquist Olsen <tomas.l.olsen gmail com>
date Thu, 14 May 2009 17:20:17 +0200
parents 12b423e17860
children
line wrap: on
line source

module tangotests.asm7;

// test massive label collisions (runtime uses Loverflow too)
extern(C) int printf(char*, ...);

void main()
{
    int a = add(1,2);
    int s = sub(1,2);
    assert(a == 3);
    assert(s == -1);
}

int add(int a, int b)
{
    int res;
    version (D_InlineAsm_X86)
    {
	asm
    	{
		mov EAX, a;
        	add EAX, b;
        	jo Loverflow;
        	mov res, EAX;
    	}
    }
    else version (D_InlineAsm_X86_64)
    {
	asm
	{
		mov EAX, a;
        	add EAX, b;
        	jo Loverflow;
        	mov res, EAX;
	}		
    }
    printf("%d\n",res);
    return res;
Loverflow:
    assert(0, "add overflow");
}

int sub(int a, int b)
{
    int res;
    version (D_InlineAsm_X86)
    {
    	asm
    	{
		mov EAX, a;
        	sub EAX, b;
        	jo Loverflow;
        	mov res, EAX;
    	}
    }
    else version (D_InlineAsm_X86_64)
    {
	asm
	{
		mov EAX, a;
        	sub EAX, b;
        	jo Loverflow;
        	mov res, EAX;
	}		
    }
    printf("%d\n",res);
    return res;
Loverflow:
    assert(0, "sub overflow");
    int x;
}