view tests/mini/asm7.d @ 1346:6f4154b318ef

Remove an old workaround that was kept around for ABI-compatibility on x86-64 between different LLVM versions. This means LLVM r67588 is required if you want to compile for x86-64, otherwise the backend will assert when you try to return e.g. struct { int i; char c; } from a function. (In particular, this is no longer compatible with LLVM 2.5) It also means that any code returning small structs on x86-64 will probably need to be recompiled in order to be linkable to code compiled with this change.
author Frits van Bommel <fvbommel wxs.nl>
date Tue, 12 May 2009 15:50:48 +0200
parents 12b423e17860
children
line wrap: on
line source

module tangotests.asm7;

// test massive label collisions (runtime uses Loverflow too)
extern(C) int printf(char*, ...);

void main()
{
    int a = add(1,2);
    int s = sub(1,2);
    assert(a == 3);
    assert(s == -1);
}

int add(int a, int b)
{
    int res;
    version (D_InlineAsm_X86)
    {
	asm
    	{
		mov EAX, a;
        	add EAX, b;
        	jo Loverflow;
        	mov res, EAX;
    	}
    }
    else version (D_InlineAsm_X86_64)
    {
	asm
	{
		mov EAX, a;
        	add EAX, b;
        	jo Loverflow;
        	mov res, EAX;
	}		
    }
    printf("%d\n",res);
    return res;
Loverflow:
    assert(0, "add overflow");
}

int sub(int a, int b)
{
    int res;
    version (D_InlineAsm_X86)
    {
    	asm
    	{
		mov EAX, a;
        	sub EAX, b;
        	jo Loverflow;
        	mov res, EAX;
    	}
    }
    else version (D_InlineAsm_X86_64)
    {
	asm
	{
		mov EAX, a;
        	sub EAX, b;
        	jo Loverflow;
        	mov res, EAX;
	}		
    }
    printf("%d\n",res);
    return res;
Loverflow:
    assert(0, "sub overflow");
    int x;
}