Fix a latent bug in the asm code. I think that technically, using "*m0" instead of "*0" allows LLVM to pick between using the same memory as output 0 and using a new memory location. (So far I haven't been able to construct a testcase that actually breaks because of this, though)

module tangotests.vararg1;

import tango.stdc.stdio;

void func(int[] arr...)
{
    printf("1,2,4,5,6 == %d,%d,%d,%d,%d\n", arr[0],arr[1],arr[2],arr[3],arr[4]);
}

void main()
{
    func(1,2,4,5,6);
}