view tests/mini/naked_asm5.d @ 978:6a32d2e18175

Fix a latent bug in the asm code. I think that technically, using "*m0" instead of "*0" allows LLVM to pick between using the same memory as output 0 and using a new memory location. (So far I haven't been able to construct a testcase that actually breaks because of this, though)
author Frits van Bommel <fvbommel wxs.nl>
date Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:38:12 +0100
parents 1b10a9c6e3e8
children a400b1dd657f
line wrap: on
line source

int foo(int op)(int a, int b)
{
    version(X86)
    {
    const OP = (op == '+') ? "add" : "sub";
    asm { naked; }
    mixin("asm{"~OP~" EAX, [ESP+4];}");
    asm { ret 4; }
    }
    else version(X86_64)
    {
    const OP = (op == '+') ? "add" : "sub";
    asm { naked; }
    mixin("asm{"~OP~" ESI,EDI; mov EAX, ESI;}");
    asm { ret; }
    }
    else static assert(0, "todo");
}

void main()
{
        int i = foo!('+')(2, 4);
        assert(i == 6);
        i = foo!('-')(2, 4);
        assert(i == 2);
}