Fix a latent bug in the asm code. I think that technically, using "*m0" instead of "*0" allows LLVM to pick between using the same memory as output 0 and using a new memory location. (So far I haven't been able to construct a testcase that actually breaks because of this, though)

void foo()
{
    version(X86)
    asm
    {
        naked;
        jmp pass;
        hlt;
pass:   ret;
    }
    else version(X86_64)
    asm
    {
        naked;
        jmp pass;
        hlt;
pass:   ret;
    }
    else static assert(0, "todo");
}

void main()
{
    foo();
}