Fix a latent bug in the asm code. I think that technically, using "*m0" instead of "*0" allows LLVM to pick between using the same memory as output 0 and using a new memory location. (So far I haven't been able to construct a testcase that actually breaks because of this, though)

interface IN
{
    void func();
}
abstract class AC
{
    abstract void func();
    long ll;
}
class C : AC
{
    void func()
    {
    }
}

void main()
{
    scope c = new C;
}