Fix a latent bug in the asm code. I think that technically, using "*m0" instead of "*0" allows LLVM to pick between using the same memory as output 0 and using a new memory location. (So far I haven't been able to construct a testcase that actually breaks because of this, though)

interface Iin
{
    void[] read(size_t n);
}

interface Iout
{
    size_t write(void[] d);
}

class C : Iin
{
    void[] read(size_t n)
    {
        return null;
    }

    size_t write(void[] d)
    {
        return 0;
    }
}

void main()
{
    scope c = new C;
}