view tests/mini/asm5.d @ 978:6a32d2e18175

Fix a latent bug in the asm code. I think that technically, using "*m0" instead of "*0" allows LLVM to pick between using the same memory as output 0 and using a new memory location. (So far I haven't been able to construct a testcase that actually breaks because of this, though)
author Frits van Bommel <fvbommel wxs.nl>
date Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:38:12 +0100
parents b2d27ddf8f45
children 855889b7b268
line wrap: on
line source

int foo()
{
    version(X86)
    {
      asm { mov EAX, 42; }
    } else version(X86_64)
    {
      asm { movq RAX, 42; }
    }
    else static assert(0, "todo");
}

ulong bar()
{
    version(X86)
    {
      asm { mov EAX, 0xFF; mov EDX, 0xAA; }
    } else version(X86_64)
    {
      asm { movq RAX, 0xFF; }
    }
    else static assert(0, "todo");
}

void main()
{
    long l = 1;
    l = 2;
    l = 4;
    l = 8;
    assert(foo() == 42);
    version(X86)
    {
        assert(bar() == 0x000000AA000000FF);
    } else version(X86_64)
    {
        assert(bar() == 0x00000000000000FF);
    }
}