Fix a latent bug in the asm code. I think that technically, using "*m0" instead of "*0" allows LLVM to pick between using the same memory as output 0 and using a new memory location. (So far I haven't been able to construct a testcase that actually breaks because of this, though)

module arrays3;

void main()
{
    int[] arr;
    {arr = new int[25];}
    {assert(arr.length == 25);}
    {arr.length = arr.length + 5;}
    {assert(arr.length == 30);}
}