Fix a latent bug in the asm code. I think that technically, using "*m0" instead of "*0" allows LLVM to pick between using the same memory as output 0 and using a new memory location. (So far I haven't been able to construct a testcase that actually breaks because of this, though)

void main()
{
    int[4] a = [1,2,3,4];
    int[4] b = [5,6,7,8];
    a[] += b[];
    assert(a[0] == 6);
    assert(a[1] == 8);
    assert(a[2] == 10);
    assert(a[3] == 12);
}