Fix a latent bug in the asm code. I think that technically, using "*m0" instead of "*0" allows LLVM to pick between using the same memory as output 0 and using a new memory location. (So far I haven't been able to construct a testcase that actually breaks because of this, though)

// bug #191

int[3] a = [0: 0, 2: 42, 1: 1];

void main()
{
  assert(a[0] == 0);
  assert(a[1] == 1); // fails!
  assert(a[2] == 42);
}