Mercurial > projects > ldc
view tests/mini/asm7.d @ 1605:1d5721f9ae18
[WIP] Merge DMD r251: bugzilla 111 (appending a dchar to a char[])
This patch needs some work in the code generation, because of the runtime
changes (functions "_d_arrayappendcd" and "_d_arrayappendwd" are added).
This doesn't affect existing code though, it just makes with patch
a little useless, because something like this:
char [] s;
s ~= '\u6211';
That failed to compile with a nice error message previously to this
change, now fails with and ugly error message (a failed assertion).
Apparently there is a regression introduced by this patch too, when
compiling Dil I get this assertion message:
ldc: /home/luca/tesis/ldc/gen/statements.cpp:132: virtual void ReturnStatement::toIR(IRState*): Assertion `p->topfunc()->getReturnType() == llvm::Type::getVoidTy(gIR->context())' failed.
0 ldc 0x08a91628
Thank god we have bisecting capabilities in VCSs now ;)
---
dmd/expression.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
author | Leandro Lucarella <llucax@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:18:19 -0300 |
parents | 12b423e17860 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
module tangotests.asm7; // test massive label collisions (runtime uses Loverflow too) extern(C) int printf(char*, ...); void main() { int a = add(1,2); int s = sub(1,2); assert(a == 3); assert(s == -1); } int add(int a, int b) { int res; version (D_InlineAsm_X86) { asm { mov EAX, a; add EAX, b; jo Loverflow; mov res, EAX; } } else version (D_InlineAsm_X86_64) { asm { mov EAX, a; add EAX, b; jo Loverflow; mov res, EAX; } } printf("%d\n",res); return res; Loverflow: assert(0, "add overflow"); } int sub(int a, int b) { int res; version (D_InlineAsm_X86) { asm { mov EAX, a; sub EAX, b; jo Loverflow; mov res, EAX; } } else version (D_InlineAsm_X86_64) { asm { mov EAX, a; sub EAX, b; jo Loverflow; mov res, EAX; } } printf("%d\n",res); return res; Loverflow: assert(0, "sub overflow"); int x; }