Update comments now that LLVM PR3861 has been fixed. However, since conditionally removing the workaround makes the ABI dependent on LLVM version, I reconsidered that. (The same revision of LDC compiling for the same target should probably produce code that follows the same ABI, right?)

module tangotests.vararg1;

import tango.stdc.stdio;

void func(int[] arr...)
{
    printf("1,2,4,5,6 == %d,%d,%d,%d,%d\n", arr[0],arr[1],arr[2],arr[3],arr[4]);
}

void main()
{
    func(1,2,4,5,6);
}