Update comments now that LLVM PR3861 has been fixed. However, since conditionally removing the workaround makes the ABI dependent on LLVM version, I reconsidered that. (The same revision of LDC compiling for the same target should probably produce code that follows the same ABI, right?)

// bug #191

int[3] a = [0: 0, 2: 42, 1: 1];

void main()
{
  assert(a[0] == 0);
  assert(a[1] == 1); // fails!
  assert(a[2] == 42);
}