view dmd2/complex_t.h @ 945:03d7c4aac654

SWITCHED TO LLVM 2.5 ! Applied patch from ticket #129 to compile against latest LLVM. Thanks Frits van Bommel. Fixed implicit return by asm block at the end of a function on x86-32. Other architectures will produce an error at the moment. Adding support for new targets is fairly simple. Fixed return calling convention for complex numbers, ST and ST(1) were switched around. Added some testcases. I've run a dstress test and there are no regressions. However, the runtime does not seem to compile with symbolic debug information. -O3 -release -inline works well and is what I used for the dstress run. Tango does not compile, a small workaround is needed in tango.io.digest.Digest.Digest.hexDigest. See ticket #206 .
author Tomas Lindquist Olsen <tomas.l.olsen@gmail.com>
date Sun, 08 Feb 2009 05:26:54 +0100
parents f04dde6e882c
children
line wrap: on
line source


// Compiler implementation of the D programming language
// Copyright (c) 1999-2006 by Digital Mars
// All Rights Reserved
// written by Walter Bright and Burton Radons
// http://www.digitalmars.com
// License for redistribution is by either the Artistic License
// in artistic.txt, or the GNU General Public License in gnu.txt.
// See the included readme.txt for details.

#ifndef DMD_COMPLEX_T_H
#define DMD_COMPLEX_T_H

/* Roll our own complex type for compilers that don't support complex
 */

struct complex_t
{
    long double re;
    long double im;    

    complex_t() { this->re = 0; this->im = 0; }
    complex_t(long double re) { this->re = re; this->im = 0; }
    complex_t(long double re, long double im) { this->re = re; this->im = im; }

    complex_t operator + (complex_t y) { complex_t r; r.re = re + y.re; r.im = im + y.im; return r; }
    complex_t operator - (complex_t y) { complex_t r; r.re = re - y.re; r.im = im - y.im; return r; }
    complex_t operator - () { complex_t r; r.re = -re; r.im = -im; return r; }
    complex_t operator * (complex_t y) { return complex_t(re * y.re - im * y.im, im * y.re + re * y.im); }
    
    complex_t operator / (complex_t y)
    {
	long double abs_y_re = y.re < 0 ? -y.re : y.re;
	long double abs_y_im = y.im < 0 ? -y.im : y.im;
	long double r, den;

	if (abs_y_re < abs_y_im)
	{
	    r = y.re / y.im;
	    den = y.im + r * y.re;
	    return complex_t((re * r + im) / den,
			     (im * r - re) / den);
	}
	else
	{
	    r = y.im / y.re;
	    den = y.re + r * y.im;
	    return complex_t((re + r * im) / den,
			     (im - r * re) / den);
	}
    }

    operator bool () { return re || im; }

    int operator == (complex_t y) { return re == y.re && im == y.im; }
    int operator != (complex_t y) { return re != y.re || im != y.im; }
};

inline complex_t operator * (long double x, complex_t y) { return complex_t(x) * y; }
inline complex_t operator * (complex_t x, long double y) { return x * complex_t(y); }
inline complex_t operator / (complex_t x, long double y) { return x / complex_t(y); }


inline long double creall(complex_t x)
{
    return x.re;
}

inline long double cimagl(complex_t x)
{
    return x.im;
}

#endif